VII. Authorities Table
| Authority | Subject |
|---|---|
| Cal. Gov. Code § 12940 | FEHA core prohibitions |
| Cal. Gov. Code § 12960 | CRD complaint windows; AB 9 three-year extension |
| Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5 | Whistleblower retaliation |
| Cal. Lab. Code § 226 | Itemized wage statements |
| Cal. Lab. Code § 226.7 | Meal/rest premiums |
| Cal. Lab. Code § 925 | Out-of-state forum void |
| Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq. | PAGA |
| Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600 | Categorical non-compete prohibition |
| Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.1 | AB 1076 notice requirement |
| Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.5 | SB 699 private right of action |
| Cal. Civ. Code § 1542 | Unknown-claim release rule |
| Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 167 | Public-policy wrongful discharge |
| Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937 | No "narrow restraint" exception |
| Harris v. City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal.4th 203 | Substantial-motivating-factor standard |
| State Dept. of Health Services v. Superior Court (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1026 (McGinnis) | Avoidable-consequences in FEHA |
| Romano v. Rockwell Internat., Inc. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 479 | Limitations period accrues on actual termination |
| Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903 | ABC test |
| AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Servs., Inc. (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 923 | Employee non-solicits void |
| Whyte v. Schlage Lock Co. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1443 | No inevitable-disclosure in California |
| Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2023) 14 Cal.5th 1104 | PAGA representative standing post-arbitration |
| Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U.S. 639 (2022) | FAA preemption of PAGA splitting rule |
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult qualified counsel for advice specific to your situation. Attorney advertising.
Evaluating a Employment Law matter? Our attorneys are available for a confidential consultation.
Speak With an Attorney