Landlord-Tenant Litigation

← Back to Real Property

V. Landlord-Tenant Litigation

A. The Tenant Protection Act (Civ. Code § 1946.2, § 1947.12)

AB 1482, the Tenant Protection Act of 2019, created statewide just-cause and rent-cap protections effective January 1, 2020 and sunsetting (absent extension) January 1, 2030. It applies to most residential tenancies after 12 months of continuous occupancy (or 24 months where a new adult is added), with significant exemptions:

B. Just Cause and No-Fault Termination

Section 1946.2 enumerates at-fault just causes (nonpayment, breach, nuisance, criminal activity, refusal to renew on similar terms) and no-fault just causes (owner move-in, withdrawal from the rental market under the Ellis Act, government order to vacate, intent to demolish or substantially remodel). For no-fault terminations, the landlord must pay one month's rent in relocation assistance (or waive the final month) and provide written notice that complies with the statute's specifics.

Section 1947.12 caps annual rent increases at the lesser of 5% + CPI or 10%, calculated over any 12-month period. Rolling-window calculations and the prohibition on "stacking" multiple increases are common audit points.

C. Local Ordinance Overlays (LA RSO, SF, Santa Monica, Oakland)

AB 1482 expressly preserves stricter local regulation. Key overlays GPLG attorneys encounter:

Where multiple regimes apply, the most tenant-protective prevails. Notices must comply with all applicable regimes; a single technical defect (wrong cause-list, missing relocation language, missing AB 1482 advisory) voids the notice and the resulting unlawful detainer.

D. Habitability and Constructive Eviction

The implied warranty of habitability, codified in Civ. Code §§ 1941–1942 and elaborated in Green v. Superior Court (1974) 10 Cal.3d 616, requires the landlord to maintain the premises in a condition fit for human occupation. Breach is a defense to unlawful detainer (the Green defense) and a free-standing claim for damages, including emotional distress and, in some cases, punitive damages.

Constructive eviction occurs when the landlord's act or omission substantially deprives the tenant of beneficial use; the tenant must vacate within a reasonable time to preserve the claim. Counsel handling extended-pattern habitability claims sometimes invoke the continuing-violation theory developed in the FEHA harassment context — see Birschtein v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 994 — by analogy, although California courts have not squarely extended the doctrine to habitability.

E. The Ellis Act (Gov. Code § 7060 et seq.)

The Ellis Act preempts local rent-control ordinances to the extent they would prevent a landlord from going out of the rental business. It permits withdrawal of all units in a property from the rental market, subject to:

Local ordinances impose substantial relocation assistance (San Francisco's payments routinely exceed $8,000 per tenant; Los Angeles's are scaled by tenure and protected-status). Ellis Act notices are unforgiving: a single defect (e.g., failing to record contemporaneously, failing to serve the city) restarts the clock.



This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult qualified counsel for advice specific to your situation. Attorney advertising.

Evaluating a Real Property matter? Our attorneys are available for a confidential consultation.

Speak With an Attorney