Theories of Liability & Common Defenses
Plaintiff's Theories of Liability
Quiet TitleCCP § 760.010 et seq.
A quiet title action establishes the plaintiff's title to real property against all adverse claims. Grounds include: adverse possession (CCP § 325 — five years open, notorious, exclusive, hostile, under claim of right); forged deeds; tax sale defects; wild-deed chains; and competing recorded interests. The action requires a lis pendens to protect against intervening purchasers, and the judgment binds all persons served or whose interests are otherwise addressed by the action.
Partition of Co-Owned PropertyCCP § 872.010 et seq.; UPHPA
Any co-owner of real property has an absolute right to compel partition — either in kind (physical division) or by sale. California's 2022 adoption of the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (UPHPA) makes partition in kind the presumptive default when the property constitutes "heirs property" (co-owned primarily by family through inheritance). The UPHPA also grants co-owners the right to buy out the petitioner's share at appraised value before a forced sale — protecting family equity that the old forced-sale regime frequently destroyed.
Wrongful EvictionCiv. Code § 789.3; AB 1482
Under the Tenant Protection Act (AB 1482), covered residential tenants may be evicted only for "just cause" — either fault-based (non-payment, lease violation, criminal activity) or no-fault (owner move-in, demolition, substantial rehabilitation). Wrongful eviction claims arise when a landlord evicts without just cause, through constructive eviction (making premises uninhabitable), or by using harassment to force departure. Punitive damages, attorney fees, and civil penalties are available for willful wrongful eviction.
Construction DefectsSB 800 (Right to Repair Act)
SB 800 (the Right to Repair Act) provides a pre-litigation notice and repair process for construction defects in new residential construction. For construction completed after January 1, 2003, the buyer must follow SB 800 procedures before filing suit. The Act establishes building standards as the negligence standard of care and caps recovery at the actual damages caused by the defect. For commercial construction and pre-2003 residential construction, common-law negligence, strict liability, and breach of contract claims apply without SB 800's procedural overlay.
Easement & Boundary DisputesCiv. Code §§ 801, 801.5
Easement disputes arise over appurtenant easements, easements in gross, prescriptive easements (established by open, notorious, continuous hostile use for 5 years), and implied easements by necessity or prior use. Boundary disputes frequently involve surveys, recorded monuments, and the estoppel doctrine. Access and view easements in California hillside communities are particularly contentious and increasingly require ALTA/NSPS surveys and historical aerial photography to resolve.
Fraudulent Conveyance / CUVTACiv. Code § 3439 et seq.
The California Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (CUVTA) allows creditors and defrauded parties to avoid real property transfers made with actual fraudulent intent (badges of fraud analysis) or constructive fraud (transfer while insolvent for less than reasonably equivalent value). In real property litigation, fraudulent conveyance claims arise in mortgage fraud, deed theft, and asset-protection structures designed to place property beyond creditors' reach.
Common Defense Theories
Bona Fide Purchaser Without NoticeCiv. Code § 1214
A bona fide purchaser who takes real property for value, in good faith, and without notice of a prior unrecorded interest prevails against that interest under California's race-notice recording statute. For the defense to apply, the purchaser must have taken without actual notice (knowledge of the prior interest), constructive notice (from recorded instruments in the chain of title), or inquiry notice (from visible occupation or possession). A lis pendens defeats the BFP defense against subsequently recorded interests.
Statute of LimitationsCCP §§ 318, 319, 325
Real property actions are governed by varying limitations periods: adverse possession requires 5 years of actual possession meeting all elements (CCP § 325); actions to recover real property generally within 5 years; breach of CC&Rs typically 4 years; and construction defect claims under SB 800 are governed by the statute's internal limitations scheme (10-year outer limit for patent defects; shorter periods for specific categories). Limitations are subject to tolling by active concealment, minority, and other equitable doctrines.
Just Cause Under Tenant Protection ActAB 1482; Civ. Code § 1946.2
A landlord of a covered unit may defeat a wrongful eviction claim by proving one of the enumerated just causes under AB 1482: non-payment of rent, lease violation, criminal activity, breach of a no-subletting clause (fault-based causes); or owner move-in, substantial rehabilitation, demolition, or withdrawal from rental use under the Ellis Act (no-fault causes). No-fault evictions additionally require relocation assistance equal to one month's rent. Single-family homes with proper notice to tenants, and property owned by individuals with 10 or fewer units, may qualify for exemption.
Exhaustion of SB 800 Pre-Litigation ProcessCiv. Code § 895 et seq.
For new residential construction completed after January 1, 2003, the builder has the right to receive notice of claimed defects, inspect, and offer repair before any lawsuit may be filed. Failure to comply with SB 800's procedural requirements — including the detailed notice requirements and the builder's repair opportunity — may result in dismissal of the lawsuit. Developers routinely raise SB 800 exhaustion as an affirmative defense in residential construction defect cases.
Adverse Possession Elements MissingCCP § 325
Adverse possession requires proof of all five elements for the full five-year period: actual, open and notorious, hostile (without permission), exclusive, and continuous possession under a claim of right. The defense challenges any element — including permissive use (defeating hostility), shared possession with the true owner (defeating exclusivity), seasonal or sporadic use (defeating continuity), or the absence of property tax payment (which California also requires).
Ellis Act Defense to Eviction ClaimsGov. Code §§ 7060–7060.7
The Ellis Act permits an owner to withdraw all rental units in a building from the rental market, permitting no-fault eviction of all tenants. The Act requires proper notice (120 days, extended to one year for elderly or disabled tenants), relocation assistance, and registration of the withdrawal with the local housing authority. An Ellis Act withdrawal, if properly executed, provides a complete defense to wrongful eviction claims — but local rent-control ordinances frequently impose additional procedural requirements.
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult qualified counsel for advice specific to your situation. Attorney advertising.
Evaluating a Real Property matter? Our attorneys are available for a confidential consultation.
Speak With an Attorney